Emily Seibold vs Aleksandra Pitak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W W L W L
Form
L W W L L L L L L LHead To Head: Seibold 1 - 0 Pitak
They have played 2 sets in total, with Seibold winning 2 and Pitak winning 0. The last match between Seibold and Pitak was at the W25 Prague, 06-09-2020, Q1 round, Clay with Emily Seibold getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emily Seibold | 1 |
| Aleksandra Pitak | 0 |
W25 Prague(06-09-2020)
6
0
6
0
| Seibold | Stats | Pitak |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (9-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 629 | Ranking | 893 |
| 442 | Highest Rank | 753 |
| 25 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 53% (172-150) | Career Total W/L | 43% (54-71) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-0 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Emily Seibold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Julia Grabher
Player
Emily Seibold
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Sofia Milatova
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kathinka Von Deichmann
Player
Emily Seibold
79%
(
88 of
111)
1st Serve %
64%
(
81 of
126)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
48 of
81)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
42 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
126)
126
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(3) 6-7(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
23 of
34)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
51%
(
21 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
43
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Emily Seibold
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Antonia Vergara Rivera
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
86%
(
42 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Maria Eduarda Lages
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve %
79%
(
41 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Emily Seibold
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Ana Filipa Santos
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Aleksandra Pitak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mariia Bergen
Player
Aleksandra Pitak
69%
(
87 of
126)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
13
49%
(
43 of
87)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
12 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
53%
(
67 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
60 of
105)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Danielle Daley
Player
Aleksandra Pitak
46%
(
45 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
3
Aces
3
13
Double Faults
8
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(3) 5-7 12-10 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katy Dunne
Player
Aleksandra Pitak
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Morgina
Player
Aleksandra Pitak
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandra Pitak
Player
Linnea Malmqvist
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
77%
(
93 of
121)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
9
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
55 of
93)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
121)
109
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandra Pitak
Player
Kamila Kerimbayeva
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
63
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentina Ryser
Player
Aleksandra Pitak
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (172/150) | Win/Loss | 43% (54/71) |
| 54% (389/325) | Sets Win/Loss | 44% (120/154) |
| 53% (3304/2951) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (1190/1307) |
| 58% (38/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (40/32) |
| 54% (120/101) | Clay Win/Loss | 20% (4/16) |
| 39% (14/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 29% (7/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 397 | Aces Total | 119 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 944 | Total Double Faults | 372 |
| 1:16:48 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 455.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 466.74 |
| 60% (9008/14894) | 1st Serve % | 61% (2596/4256) |
| 60% (5391/9008) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1598/2596) |
| 44% (2584/5886) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (684/1660) |
| 50% (1048/2098) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (241/530) |
| 48% (7395/15483) | Return Points Win % | 45% (1939/4317) |
| 46% (70/82) | Challenger W/L | 31% (14/31) |
| 60% (102/68) | Futures W/L | 50% (40/40) |
| 55% (169/308) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (52/123) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (17/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (15/27) |
| 46% (36/78) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (12/26) |
| 88% (178/157) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (55/49) |
| 12% (178/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (55/6) |
| 12% (144/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (70/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
